Arantxa Rus vs Lina Gjorcheska Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Mar at 06:45 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Rus vs L. Gjorcheska

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

MKD
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rus 1 - 0 Gjorcheska
They have played 3 sets in total, with Arantxa Rus winning 2 and Lina Gjorcheska winning 1. The last match between Arantxa Rus and Lina Gjorcheska was at the W75 Szekesfehervar, 12-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Arantxa Rus getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rus | 1 |
| Gjorcheska | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W75 Szekesfehervar(03-12-25)
A. Rus vs L. Gjorcheska H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,661,895 | Career Prize Money | $33,613 |
| 61.18% (744-472) | Career Total W/L | 63.91% (494-279) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 36 | Titles | 15 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 21.43% (3-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Rus vs L. Gjorcheska Match Preview:
Analyzing the second serve performance in the last six months, we find Rus leading with a point win rate of 39.01% compared to Gjorcheska's 34.48%. This metric is crucial as it significantly influences the prediction accuracy for the outcome of matches. A higher percentage in this area demonstrates resilience and skill under serve pressure, hinting at potential dominance in the upcoming match.
When evaluating return game statistics, Gjorcheska exhibits a marginally better record with 54.36% of opponent's second serve points won, surpassing Rus's 50.83%. However, in first serve returns, Rus holds a slight advantage with 34.18% compared to Gjorcheska's 33.6%. Such nuances can be decisive in head-to-head matchups, shaping the odds in particular scenarios.
Under pressure analysis indicates that Rus has successfully saved 52.73% of breakpoints recently, while Gjorcheska has a slightly lower breakpoint save rate of 48.4%. This statistic can be pivotal in in-game predictions and betting, as it reflects a player's ability to handle high-pressure situations and potentially shift the momentum of a match.
In terms of match performance over the past year, Gjorcheska presents a stronger winning percentage at 52.94% (W/L 27/24) in contrast to Rus, who shares an equal win-loss ratio of 50% (W/L 32/32). This overall performance overview provides insight into their consistency, suggesting Gjorcheska might be slightly more reliable in terms of match victories.
A comparison of career surface win percentages reveals that both players excel on Clay, with Rus having a 68% win rate (W/L 429/204) and Gjorcheska at 67% (W/L 362/182). Grass surfaces seem unfavorable for both, notably with Gjorcheska yet to win a match (W/L 0/2). Understanding surface preferences is essential for contextualizing their performance in upcoming matches.
Considering the level of tournaments they have participated in, Rus competes primarily on the Main tour with a winning percentage of 35.71% (W/L 10/18), whereas Gjorcheska's success is more marked in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with a success rate of 56.25% (W/L 27/21). The comparative event level details provide a clearer picture of each player's experience against top-tier opponents.
Assessing opponent quality, Rus has faced competitors with an average rank of 134.47 over the past year, which contrasts sharply with Gjorcheska's opponents averaging a rank of 237.75. This disparity indicates a tougher competitive environment for Rus, potentially enhancing her preparedness for higher-ranked challenges.
If the match proceeds to a deciding set, current data shows Gjorcheska has a higher victory rate of 47% compared to Rus's 44% in such situations over the past year. This minor edge could factor into real-time predictions, especially in prolonged encounters.
Finally, analyzing recent breakpoint conversion rates, Gjorcheska leads with 40.94% of opportunities seized, overshadowing Rus's 33.71%. This stat proves pivotal during critical service games, suggesting an aggressiveness that might tip the scales in favor of Gjorcheska.
Overall, the comprehensive analysis of their recent performances, surface preferences, and tournament levels strongly suggests that Gjorcheska has a slight statistical edge. Given these elements, she might be inclined to emerge victorious in this matchup based on the statistical data considered.
Arantxa Rus vs Lina Gjorcheska Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Rus vs L. Gjorcheska H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:57:42 | Average Match Time | 1:57:42 |
| 71% (66/93) | 1st Serve % | 67% (49/73) |
| 67% (44/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (30/49) |
| 48% (13/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 45% (33/73) | Return Points Win % | 39% (36/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Rus Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | L | 6-1 7-6(6) | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 7-5 | ||
QF | L | 0-6 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | ||
L. Gjorcheska Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 1-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 5-7 7-6(5) | ||

A. Rus vs L. Gjorcheska Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.24% (741/469) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.91% (494/279) |
| 59.26% (1638/1126) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.59% (1097/684) |
| 54.02% (13606/11579) | Games Win/Loss | 55.17% (8820/7167) |
| 52.60% (172/155) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (56/42) |
| 67.11% (457/224) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.95% (393/194) |
| 62.42% (93/56) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.33% (45/41) |
| 35.85% (19/34) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1708 | Aces Total | 1043 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 3138 | Total Double Faults | 2132 |
| 1:9:54 | Average Match Time | 1:2:26 |
| 496.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 537.8 |
| 69% (41057/59854) | 1st Serve % | 64% (22132/34476) |
| 62% (25498/41057) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (13845/22132) |
| 46% (8674/18802) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5363/12343) |
| 48% (3584/7529) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2394/4754) |
| 45% (27239/59878) | Return Points Win % | 48% (16730/34748) |
| 41.58% (42/59) | Slam W/L | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 41.10% (30/43) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (18/18) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49.28% (136/140) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 70.88% (494/203) | Challenger W/L | 61.52% (283/177) |
| 77.78% (21/6) | Futures W/L | 69.97% (205/88) |
| 61% (731/1193) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (488/761) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 44% (108/246) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (78/141) |
| 54% (189/349) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (125/233) |
| 88% (730/642) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (480/416) |
| 12% (730/87) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (480/64) |
| 20% (480/98) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (293/78) |